Within the meantime I’ll leave you with this thought provoking story featuring a financial domme who got jailed for blackmail. Essentially the scene was pushed to a point that the submissive preferred to make contact with the police instead of spend the 6000 euros necessary to escape it. Given the limited facts available it’s tough to know who precisely was at fault. Was this the equivalent of a client negotiating a light spanking and after that alleging assault when he received a heavy beating? Or the equivalent of negotiating a heavy beating and then alleging assault when he was given precisely that? Prostate massagers are male sex toys that were designed to stimulate the prostate gland.
I’m on record as not getting a fan of monetary domination, and my issues about a ‘duty of care’ do look to be born out with this case. If a person was prepared to risk the shame and humiliation of exposing their kink towards the world, they should have been pushed effectively beyond their limits, and that suggests the dommes genuinely weren’t paying attention to their clientele well-being. But as I said, it is difficult to know what definitely occurred without having seeing extra details. Offered the lack of standing BDSM has inside the law, the truth two people today have been jailed doesn’t necessarily mean they have been entirely at fault.
No comments:
Post a Comment